Mountain Building Rubric
3 Points | 2 Points | 1 Point | 0 Points | |
Design | The team's design was carried out on the base. The team followed the investigation steps well. | The team's design mostly followed the steps but there was some variance. The mountain was built on the base with some in the pan. | The team 's design incorporated the base and the pan. | The team's design was built in the pan. The bowl was not used as a base. |
Explanation of Plan | The student was able to explain the group's plan with much detail. | The student was able to explain the team's plan with moderate detail. | The student was able to explain the team's plan with little detail. | The student was unable to explain the team's plan. |
Resists Erosion | The design withstood erosion well. The mountain eroded slowly. Much of the material remained on the base. | The design withstood erosion in the beginning. Erosion quickened once it began. A moderate amount of material was left on the base. | The mountain eroded fairly quickly but did leave some material on the base. | The entire mountain quickly eroded from the base. |
Collaboration | The student was observed during the planning and constructing stages to be an active contributor with ideas and responsibility. The student positively shared in the activity. | The student was observed during the planning and construction stages to contribute when asked by team members. The student was positively involved in the activity. | The student was not observed as a contributor in one of the two stages but did not disrupt the flow of the investigation for his group. | The student did not contribute in either planning or construction. The student disrupted the flow of the investigation for his group. |
Data Collection | The student took detailed notes of each group's design and the results of the erosion. | The student took notes of both the design and the results of each group 's model but with limited detail. | The student was missing notes in either design or results of each group's model. | The student did not collect sufficient data in design or results of the groups' models. |
Total | /15 |